Britical

September 28, 2005

The Weather

NYC

The weather has been so deathly dull and overcast of late. And hot! Nothing worse when it’s meant to be fall. Instead: long, heavy grey days whose main purpose seems to be to suck every ounce of spirit out of me as if I’ve been lurching about all day around under some huge, sodden, itchy blanket. But the other night some rain! And this exchange:

Audrey: It’s raining! I love the rain!
Friend: Oh, c’mon, you just like the rain because…
Audrey:…No! It’s not because I’m English. I just like it. I like rain because it’s something.

Of course, you’ll be dismayed to know that matters were not permitted to escalate: my friend, being wisely gracious, made some tactful, mollifying noises and moved us briskly along to less fraught conversational pastures. But there you have it. My point. Not very poetic but valid all the same: Rain feels like Something, like something is happening. There is romance to it. Like fall, it possesses melancholy, much in the way that snow (my favourite) has poignancy. Summer sunshine, of course, is just crass.

In England, as you know, it is not so much that it rains more than it does here (it doesn’t, I am told), but that London is so unrelentingly overcast. You might argue there is subtlety in this so-called weather, and cite the Brontes and so on. However, I would remind you that the best bits in ‘Wuthering Heights’ occur during storms. After all, while London’s latitude is on a par with Alaska’s, New York is directly across from Rome. (If you live in London this must be a quite sobering revelation.) I wonder if it’s this that makes so many winter days here sparkle with those clean, effortless-seeming blue skies?

There is even a very particular and beautiful shade of that crisp blue, a more opaque and intense version, that I think of, horridly, as September 11th Blue. It appears once or twice a year. I doubt I’m the only one who notices. And while it is certainly Something, it is not welcome, although it would have been before, back in the day.

 

 

Copyright Britical 2005

September 25, 2005

Spooky Action at a Distance

NYC

Last night, while you were being piously wholesome in the country, I made sure to go see ‘Renee Risque and the Art Lovers’. They’re just the most cheerfully, mock degenerate band with brilliant tunes, a packed house and outre pottymouths. Afterwards, we decided to skip the post-gig after-party discussions and jumped in a cab to Gramercy Park heading for a party at The Players Club. Odd crowd there. It seemed to be accessorized with a bunch of peacocky Conde Nast trustfunder interns and fashion photographers all trying to outglitter the chandeliers and Tiffany glass as they swarmed underneath. Interestingly, I did notice a rather suspect and probably deliberate dearth of Vogue’s “latest fall looks” - perhaps because they are slightly behind the Manhattan curve and thus fit only to be foisted upon the plebes who actually read the glossy thing. There was also a woman floating about in the bathroom who looked exactly like Heather Graham - but prettier, less Tweety Bird. Later, we realised this was Heather Graham. An amusing party, then.

Did you ever see that film, the annoyingly titled ‘What the *&%$##@ Do We Know?’? It was, I suppose, a well-meaning beginners primer on quantum theory and its connections with Eastern thought and mysticism. Yes, the usual stuff. And yes, I am being horribly condescending. The filmmakers had, bless ‘em, tried to dramatize said theory using a lengthy and highly irritating cartoon wedding sequence and Marlee Matalin. I suppose if you’ve been living in a hole and never heard of sub-atomic particle physics then this was no doubt all a fabulous, mind-bending revelation for you. But for me the only fascinating section of the film was getting to watch all these CalTech-y physicists talk about the nature of energy - presumably quantum energy - and their belief that things can become manifest simply by a person willing it to be so. This notion of being able to bring things into your life is an old one of course, and was long ago adopted by hippies and therapists, in both cases to let you know your misery was self-induced. However, I think the idea can have value.

Stuck in traffic on the way to the party, I was thinking about this and decided to attempt a little experiment to try and summon up an actual person, through dodgy quantum means. Of course, I have tried this exercise on a couple of occcasions before, usually involving wads of cash or being left an entire brownstone in some kindly stranger’s will - to no avail. Mais voila, not fifteen minutes after this silly thought, my friend, in the words of Harry Potter, apparated. And in the very same room with me to boot. He was wearing some ill-advised red chequered riff on Scarecrow from The Wizard of Oz’s shirt, and, sitting at an empty table with a couple of people, looked as scruffy as advertized. He was wrapped up in an apparently earnest discussion with an anonymous pudgy man, and seemingly immune to the rest of the party whirling self-consciously around him. Alas, this obliviousness extended to a small blonde woman sitting to his right. She looked sulky, and, not being a “sultry” brunettish sort, this made her look merely peevish; tight-lipped, perhaps impatient to just leave. Once, on my rounds of the giddy room, I glanced over and saw her pat weakly, briefly, at his back. If he was aware of her ministrations it didn’t show. He was still talking intensely to the man, head nodding vigourously as he made some vital, Serious point, finger stabbing the empty air.

As you may know, this person is generally regarded as unforgivably ubiquitous in these parts. This is galling. And such complaining seems rather tactless when performed in front of this writer. As for me, vaguely aghast at all the desperate, competing Conde Nast fabulousness in the room, I wondered if I hadn’t just started my own alarming trend: quantum stalking.

 

 

Copyright Britical 2005

September 23, 2005

Some Charismatic Maniac

NYC

Can we talk about the natty Tom Wolfe? I know we went to see him speak a couple of nights ago in The Great Hall at Cooper Square, but we were too busy trading gossip and scarfing down chocolate cake afterwards to launch any sort of post-mortem. I feel some acknowledgement is required!

He was up onstage with another, very young author whose name I don’t recall - perhaps you do? But then, if you feel important enough to affect the one-name-only thing, I reckon my forgetting it is the least I can do for him. Anyway, One Name Only guy read first and was amusing enough and very animated in a way that made me think he would have been happier, for some reason, in drag and was indeed wishing he could be in drag at that very moment. Was I wrong? I think it would have helped him get “in character”. I was, though, very grateful that he didn’t lurch into some “spoken word” rant. Poor sod. I felt sorry for him up there with Tom bloody Wolfe of all people, sitting there, hardly real, in linen, in his blinding white suit. Where was his hat? I felt he was trying (not inconspicuosly!) very hard to not upstage by his mere presence. It was perhaps all a bit self-consciously generous. But then what to do? What shape to make your famous face for half an hour while the audience breathlessly watches you watch some young whippersnapper read aloud about people called Ubiquity and Lolita. He had this weak smile delicately pasted on his face that hovered halfway between polite appreciation and… a moue of distaste. I spent most of One Name’s reading trying to decipher which.

You could almost hear all the Upper West Side/West Village “bohemian” NPR types wetting their Whole Foods knickers when at last Wolfe got up to speak. He read from his new book, “I Am Charlotte Simmons”. He’d studied college campuses reasearching his main college girl character so he stood there in that lovely white suit (visions of racks and racks of them pristinely receding along the corridors of a vast warehouse like the closing image of ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’, not to mention “I’ve. Never. Seen. Such. Beautiful. Suits!”). Looking very Olde Time, he opened his mouth and out poured an astonishing medley of filthy rap song lyrics, “Omigod” dialogue and newfangled phrases like “Sextiled” and “Dormcest”. But as he read there was a lot of unintentional stopping and stuttering though, didn’t you think? I worried for him - the legend! The room was less than half full. I remembered how “The Bonfire of the Vanities’ was the first book I read when I got to New York. I hardly understood it…all these obscure references to people, politicking and institutions I was yet to learn anything about. But it was huge and dazzling, and yet tiny and human where those things matter. He seemed incredibly savvy the other night in some sense that made me suspect he’s up to date in ways I am not. I wondered how old he was. From where we were sitting you couldn’t tell at all; in fact his face had that look that people describe, patronizingly, as “ageless”. But that is exactly how he looked.

In the question and answer session he affected much modesty and humour, as is expected in such cases. When all the old hippies got up to ask him, inevitably, about the Sixties, he said he thought there was God and Religion back then. Do you remember? That families could rely on the comfort, the ritual, the overarching authority perhaps of this, but that now, with religion waning (at least in the NorthEast) he felt there was a sort of void. (As you know, I truly envy those who believe you’ll be alive after you’re dead.) “This would be an ideal time”, he said, “for some charismatic maniac” to appear. No one said anything but, being good Manhattan Democrats, I know we were all thinking exactly the same thing.

 

 

Copyright Britical 2005

September 21, 2005

A Little Bit of England (Not!)

NYC
 
A pox on both our houses! You know, I proudly take it as a given by now, but feel a little misplaced melancholy when you refer to New York as my town. Living here, I admit to acquiring, in some strange exercise of backwards entropy, not rust but polish. I have Gone Native!

It’s said you’re a real New Yorker after five years of being here, although in typical New York fashion, this definition is self-servingly malleable according to who is laying claim - and why. In this way we end up with SoHo House 2.1 - the inevitable New York version. No, the place is not quite a theme park - a la the hilarious Ralph Lauren Manse on 72nd Street - but I wonder if it shouldn’t be. It is, after all, dismayingly short of what I had naively imagined would be one of those stuffy, cigar smoke-filled sanctuaries full of crusty old waiters, thrillingly misogynistic old rich geysers, huge sofas with the stuffing spilling out and gorgeous women with long, Bakelite cigarette holders shrieking, “Oh but dahling, you simply must…!” Perhaps this is because I have never gotten around to visiting the London original, and why it is probably best that I never do.

My few ex-pat friends here loudly complain that SoHo House NY is “trashy”, that they “let effing anyone in” and that the rules for admittance in London are more stringent. I wonder if this is true, or if we’ve all, pond and island-hopping opportunists that we are, simply drunk our own Anglo-flavoured Kool Aid. After all, any Brit here will slyly tell you (if you’re also British), that it does not behoove you, even nowadays, even in Manhattan, to misplace your English accent.

Gain admittance to what many think of as fortress SoHo House NYC and among all the bewilderingly dressed way up, the jarring American accented and the uptalking PR girls with their hair stuck to their lipgloss, is the miniature special smoking section cunningly disguised as: The Games Room. This is arguably the most English room in the place because it is here that daringly decadent sorts are permitted to smoke. Aware that this dubious privilege, together with the $1000 plus yearly membership dues, allow you to indulge on a mere whim in a thrilling game of table football, well, you feel almost obliged to coincidentally fancy lighting up a fag when you’re in there whether you want to or not, don’t you? It really makes you feel like a Someone.

But wearying of this, faced with the rather impolite coughing up of your own lung tissue, you are entitled to stagger up to the weirdly self-congratulatory ambience of the roof deck where the “swimming” pool may as well be rubber and is fit only for self-consciously paddling-while-drinking (surely a misdemeanor) and the displaying of flesh (usually disappointing, and therefore in my view a felony). Everyone everywhere is terribly busy protesting too much, sartorially or otherwise - not least myself because, apart from writing this, and horrid secret-snob that I am, I recently had Amex amend the first name on my credit card to an initial only. This was in no small part to thwart the christian name greetings of “the help” (so much for noblesse oblige), an over-familiarity that in England would be regarded as rather an affront - to both parties.

Perhaps it is just accents. I wonder how different the two places can really be at, say, 2am on a Sunday morning? You say, Sybil, that the British version is fuelled by the great levellers of powder and champagne, as must be the American copycat. Ditto, surely, the schmoozing, skirt/pants-chasing and general atmosphere of anxiety, of imminent status slippage. In London I can only assume the typically English habit of consciously dressing down makes it seem even less some ridiculous jazz age fever dream of my Americanly Brideshead imagination than the SoHo House I have here, right in New York - a city that is, as you say, my very own.

As Brits we do pride ourselves on both our deliberate crudeness on one hand, and our would-be lack of crassness and upright composure at the other. (At worst we might charitably admit to a surfeit of sarcasm, while the Americans, baffled by the puzzling combination of MerchantIvory films and English football hooligans, try just too hard and too loudly.) We take it for granted that we can have it both ways. Anyone else (unless British) trying to pull off this nifty trick is a wanker - doomed to failure, or at least a Paddington Hard Stare. But put a bunch of Brits in SoHo House NY for an evening, turn the sound down to mute, and I wonder if you’d be able to tell the difference? Possibly not. Except the Yanks, bless ‘em, would be better dressed.

Have a nice day!

 

 

Copyright Britical 2005

September 5, 2005

C - - t! A Primer

NYC

Or perhaps I should say: Hello, you old cunt! And yet I’m not sure how you feel about cunt. Although I can guess, not in the girl-on-girl action way, but in the marvellously and endlessly adaptable English person’s usage of the word itself. To wit, the myriad uses of cunt in the U.K:

Disgusted: “He’s a right cunt!”
Affectionate: “C’mere you old cunt!”
Supportive: “Wot a cunt!”
Dismissive: “That cunt Rick.”
Indulgent: “Now don’t get all cunty on me, darling.”

And few in Blighty will even bat an eyelash. Even my mother.

In America it’s oddly, but actually quite satisfyingly different, and I was reminded of this yesterday at my friend L.’s champagne soaked Sunday brunch party when, among other things, conversation lurched into the lad or Maxim mag. territory of the Donkey Punch, the Dolphin, the Jelly Doughnut et al. Although these three examples are actually all quite lacklustre in my opinion, there is one in particular that I regard as truly inspired in its puerile hilarity; The Bronco. I’m tempted to tell you to Google it but what the hell, here’s how it all goes down: you’re some sort of doughy frat guy and you’re schtupping some poor gal and unbeknownst to her you have all your mates hiding in the closet. Mid thrust said mates, right on cue, burst into the room - surprise! - to the recoiling shockhorror of the gal. Aim of the game: how long can you, the guy, keep yourself on top of the shrieking, mortified lass. Funny? Yes, absolutely, but arguably you had to be there. And perhaps you have to be English, or a certain sort of American male (most, I would argue, but maybe that’s just my friends) to appreciate it.

Relating the ins and outs of the Bronco yesterday in vaguely mixed company, I noticed all the English girls immediately shriek with laughter, their brunch splatting the creamy walls, while the bewildered Americans just sat there looking for all the world as if they’d just swallowed something rather huge and nasty by mistake but weren’t quite sure whether they were allowed to spit it out or not. For me, I am sure this particular look of vomity repulsion accompanied the recent mention of a coy, terrfiyingly icky word: ‘Lady Garden’, a term I am still wishing I’d never heard of. As they like to say here: “Euwww!!!” And so, for an American, it goes with “cunt”.

Cunt. Cunt cunt cunt! There, I said it. No biggie, as they say here. Still, all English folks in New York know very well that if you want to cause a naughty stir, create a special tiny moment at parties here, all you have to do is find a way to work that pretty word into your snotty accented conversation et voila! Not that it isn’t risky, mind you. There’s always someone who will, in their irritating uptalk, mutter exactly this: “You know, I really don’t like that word?” But fuck them, the cunt, no, you go right ahead. There is nothing more pleasurable than to jauntily wheel this one out to delight one and all. Especially at Christmas. The looks on the faces, the suspended wine glasses, the awkward pauses. Still, a warning from Miss Manners here: I do feel really quite strongly that cunt should trip prettily off the lips in as blase a way as possible. It should not seem contrived, or said deliberately to shock, but should be inserted casually in the very middle of your sentence, very by-the-by, very off the cuff.
However, if this seems too difficult (or constraining) then try it at the end of a comment but ensure the crisply vicious emphasis of the ‘c’ and ‘t’.(”Darling, you’re better off without him, he was such a perfectly tedious cunt.”) This will make you sound Terribly British, but less in the sort of dead common, flat-vowelled Mike Leigh manner discussed above, but more in a dashingly glinty-eyed poshly riding crop-wielding MerchantIvory way. Believe me, your listeners be too cowed to object, indeed they will find themselves thrilling, despite themselves, to the sound of it. As you perfect your oeuvre, they may even start begging you to say it again.

 

 

Copyright Britical 2005